Confusio: Reference to Roman Law in the House of Lords and the Development of English Private Law
Roman Legal Tradition, Vol. 5, pp. 24-66, 2009
43 Pages Posted: 26 Dec 2009 Last revised: 29 Dec 2009
Date Written: December 22, 2009
Abstract
This paper examines the use of Roman law by members of the House of Lords in three recent decisions: Fairchild vs. Glenhaven Funeral Services [2002] UKHL 22; Foskett vs. McKeown [2001] 1 AC 102; and OBG vs. Allan [2007] UKHL 21, The contrasting views of Professor Peter Birks and Professor Sir Basil Markesinis are considered, and it is argued that within the decisions can be seen the value of reference to Roman law.
Keywords: Roman Law, Tort, Unjust Enrichment, Restitution, Comparative Law, English Law
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Lee, James, Confusio: Reference to Roman Law in the House of Lords and the Development of English Private Law (December 22, 2009). Roman Legal Tradition, Vol. 5, pp. 24-66, 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1527209 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1527209
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.