The Younger Doctrine: Reconstructing Reconstruction

80 Pages Posted: 10 Jan 2010

See all articles by Hugh C. MacGill

Hugh C. MacGill

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Aviam Soifer

University of Hawaii at Manoa - William S. Richardson School of Law

Date Written: August 1, 1977

Abstract

Before the 1974 Term, it was still barely plausible to declare that "in first amendment cases Younger should be discarded. The sooner the better." Such a statement now would be tantamount to complaining about gravity or the second law of thermodynamics. By the end of the 1974 Term, the Court had gone so far in attempting to pump the principles of Younger into every cranny of the dual-court structure that, however unfortunate the policy or inept its implementation, the process was more likely to continue than to abate. The Court has gone still further since - too far to pull back without having to be candid and conscious, not only of what it has done, but of what it would then be doing. It has not been able to declare itself openly as it has advanced, and no issue relating to Younger has been joined to date with the requisite equipoise of votes that would require or even enable it to do so in retreat.

Suggested Citation

MacGill, Hugh C. and Soifer, Aviam, The Younger Doctrine: Reconstructing Reconstruction (August 1, 1977). Texas Law Review, Vol. 55, No. 7, pp. 1141-1215, 1977. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1530868

Hugh C. MacGill

affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )

Aviam Soifer (Contact Author)

University of Hawaii at Manoa - William S. Richardson School of Law ( email )

2515 Dole St.
Honolulu, HI 96822-2350
United States

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
10
Abstract Views
383
PlumX Metrics