Norm Conflicts, International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law
HUMAN RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW, Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, Vol. XIX/1, Orna Ben-Naftali ed., Oxford University Press, 2010
36 Pages Posted: 6 Jan 2010
Date Written: January 5, 2010
One of the most powerful methods of inducing changes in outcomes governed by international humanitarian law is to add human rights rules and arguments into the equation. This, indeed, is precisely the point of the whole project of linking these two branches of international law. This article explores the relationship between the two bodies of law, and makes several broad propositions. First, that there is a need for a change in perspective, from examining the relationship of the two regimes as such, to the interaction of particular norms that regulate specific situations. Second, that this interaction will frequently result in a norm conflict, and that we have numerous tools at our disposal for either avoiding or resolving these conflicts. Third, that lex specialis is at best a fairly limited tool of norm conflict avoidance, and that it most certainly cannot be used to describe the relationship between human rights and humanitarian law as a whole. Finally, that there are situations where all of our tools will fail us, where a norm conflict will be both unavoidable and unresolvable due to a fundamental incompatibility in the text, object and purpose, and values protected by the interacting norms, and where the only possible solution to the conflict will be a political one. The article identifies three such possible situations of unresolvable antinomy - targeted killings, preventive security detention, and positive obligations during occupation, and addresses recent cases with a norm conflict component, such as Al-Jedda, Behrami, and Al-Saadoon. Though in most cases harmony between human rights and humanitarian law is possible, and indeed desirable, we should not underestimate the practical and political relevance of situations of true norm conflict, which no amount of academic exposition will be able to fix.
Note: Pre-print of an expanded version of an article which will first appear as 'A Norm Conflict Perspective on the Relationship between International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law' in the Journal of Conflict & Security Law, Vol. 14, 2009, also published by Oxford University Press.
Keywords: international law, norm conflict, IHL, human rights, Al-Jedda, Behrami, Al-Saadoon
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Jurisdiction and Power: The Intersection of Human Rights Law & the Law of Non-International Armed Conflict in an Extraterritorial Context
By John Cerone
The Interplay between International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law in Situations of Armed Conflict
Non-Application of Civil and Political Rights Treaties Extraterritorially During Times of International Armed Conflict
Triggering State Obligations Extraterritorially: The Spatial Test in Certain Human Rights Treaties
By Ralph Wilde
Parallel Application of International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law: An Examination of the Debate
By Noam Lubell
The Cost of Conflation: Preserving the Dualism of Jus Ad Bellum and Jus in Bello in the Contemporary Law of War
The Jus Ad Bellum/Jus in Bello Distinction and the Law of Occupation
By Rotem Giladi
Playing by the Rules: Combating Al Qaeda within the Law of War
Rethinking the Divide between Jus Ad Bellum and Jus in Bello in Warfare Against Nonstate Actors
Targeted Killing in U.S. Counterterrorism Strategy and Law