A Global Model for Forecasting Political Instability
American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 190-208, January 2010
43 Pages Posted: 6 Jan 2010 Last revised: 13 Jan 2010
Date Written: January 5, 2010
Abstract
Examining onsets of political instability in countries worldwide from 1955 to 2003, we develop a model that distinguishes countries that experienced instability from those that remained stable with a two-year lead time and over 80% accuracy. Intriguingly, the model uses few variables and a simple specification. The model is accurate in forecasting the onsets of both violent civil wars and nonviolent democratic reversals, suggesting common factors in both types of change. Whereas regime type is typically measured using linear or binary indicators of democracy/ autocracy derived from the 21-point Polity scale, the model uses a nonlinear five-category measure of regime type based on the Polity components. This new measure of regime type emerges as the most powerful predictor of instability onsets, leading us to conclude that political institutions,properly specified, and not economic conditions, demography, or geography, are the most important predictors of the onset of political instability.
Keywords: Forecasting, Instability, Revolution, Civil War, Democracy, Regimes
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy. Evaluating Alternative Indices
By Gerardo L. Munck and Jay Verkuilen
-
Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research
By Robert Adcock and David Collier
-
Two Persistent Dimensions of Democracy: Contestation and Inclusiveness
By Michael Coppedge, Angel Alvarez, ...
-
Giving Order to Districts: Estimating Voter Distributions with National Election Returns
-
Varieties of Democracy Project Description
By Michael Coppedge, John Gerring, ...
-
Elections and Political Instability: Ballots to Bullets, Voting to Violence?
-
The Limits to Bureaucratic Observation: On the Role of Judgment in Comparative Political Measurement