Constitutional Law and the Future of Natural Resource Protection

THE EVOLUTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES LAW AND POLICY, Lawrence J. MacDonnell, Sarah F. Bates, eds., pp. 124-161, December 2009

Widener Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-03

38 Pages Posted: 7 Jan 2010

See all articles by James R. May

James R. May

Washburn University - Washburn University School of Law; Widener University Delaware Law School; Haub School of Law at Pace University

Date Written: January 6, 2010

Abstract

This is a chapter of a recently published book that examines how constitutional law shapes natural resources law in the United States. Following a brief background, part I identifies and discusses the various constitutional law developments affecting the scope of Congress’s power to regulate the use of natural resources. It focuses primarily on the Commerce Clause (in conjunction with the corresponding case study) and the concomitant extrinsic limits on such authority, including principles of federalism and the Tenth Amendment, as well as the diminished Nondelegation doctrine. Part II does the same for state authority and the dormant Commerce and Supremacy Clauses. Part III then examines several dynamic constitutional doctrines that tend to thwart implementation of natural resources laws, such as standing, the Takings Clause, and the Eleventh Amendment. Part IV canvasses a variety of underutilized constitutional provisions and doctrines influencing the past and future development of natural resource policy, including the Treaty, Compact, General Welfare, Due Process, and Property Clauses, and the First Amendment, and even less controversial provisions, such as the Enclave Clause. Part V concludes that constitutional law does not address natural resources law and policy except in an ad hoc fashion when the Court believes it is necessary to address some other issue – such as standing or the Eleventh Amendment. Rather than reflecting any clear constitutional thread in natural resources law, the outlook for constitutional jurisprudence in this area is a surrogate for wider debates about government regulation of human activity in the United States. At bottom are 220-year-old questions of who decides who can do what, when, and where under the U.S. Constitution.

Keywords: environmental law, constitutional law, natural resources

JEL Classification: K32

Suggested Citation

May, James, Constitutional Law and the Future of Natural Resource Protection (January 6, 2010). THE EVOLUTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES LAW AND POLICY, Lawrence J. MacDonnell, Sarah F. Bates, eds., pp. 124-161, December 2009 , Widener Law School Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-03, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1532458

James May (Contact Author)

Washburn University - Washburn University School of Law ( email )

1700 SW College Ave.
Topeka, KS 66621
United States

Widener University Delaware Law School ( email )

4601 Concord Pike
Wilmington, DE 19803-0406
United States

Haub School of Law at Pace University ( email )

78 N. Broadway
White Plains, NY 10603
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
223
Abstract Views
1,402
Rank
281,582
PlumX Metrics