Should They Stay or Should They Go? Sorting versus Human Capital Loss in Employee Turnover

38 Pages Posted: 16 Jan 2010 Last revised: 23 Sep 2013

See all articles by Bo H. Eriksen

Bo H. Eriksen

Region of Southern Denmark; affiliation not provided to SSRN

Date Written: September 23, 2013

Abstract

According to conventional wisdom, the costs of employee turnover are substantial and something that firms should avoid. Yet the causes and consequences of employee turnover are complicated. There may be both positive effects from sorting among employees and negative effects from loss of valuable human capital. Maybe poor performance is cause for turnover rather than its consequence. This study attempts to disentangle sorting effects from the effects of human capital loss while controlling for reverse causality in a panel study of 3,033 Danish small and medium-sized firms 1995-2007. I compare fixed effect and GMM estimators and the results I report suggests substantial simultaneity bias (reverse causality) which invalidates fixed effect estimates. The substantive results suggest that sorting benefits and human capital loss are mechanisms that operate simultaneously.

Keywords: Employee turnover, strategic human capital, sorting, financial performance, panel data, GMM estimation

JEL Classification: M10, M12, M51, J6, D24

Suggested Citation

Eriksen, Bo H., Should They Stay or Should They Go? Sorting versus Human Capital Loss in Employee Turnover (September 23, 2013). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1535969 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1535969

Bo H. Eriksen (Contact Author)

Region of Southern Denmark ( email )

Damhaven 12
Vejle, DK-7100
Denmark
DK-7100 (Fax)

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
604
Abstract Views
2,458
rank
48,793
PlumX Metrics