Footnotes (45)



Arbitration in Three Dimensions

Jan Paulsson

University of Miami - School of Law

January 13, 2010

LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 2/2010

The law applicable to arbitration is different from the law applicable in arbitration. The latter leads arbitrators to decide as they do. The former refers to the source of their authority and the effect of their decision – the legal order that governs arbitration. According to the territorialist thesis, an arbitration can have no foundation other than that of the legal order of the particular state where the arbitration takes place. This outdated conception is disproved by the simple factual observation that a plurality of legal orders may give effect to arbitration. Some French scholars promote the notion of an autonomous arbitral order. Inasmuch as they ultimately seek to establish this order by positing its recognition by the very state orders from which they claim autonomy, their idea is circular and in effect no more than a dressed-up variant of ordinary horizontal pluralism. But the model of horizontal pluralism fails to account for important orderings of arbitral activity. Arbitration in modern society is accurately perceived as a complex, three-dimensional form of pluralism, in which legal orders (i) are not exclusively those of states and (ii) frequently overlap.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 35

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: February 13, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Paulsson, Jan, Arbitration in Three Dimensions (January 13, 2010). LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 2/2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1536093 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1536093

Contact Information

Paulsson Jan (Contact Author)
University of Miami - School of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 248087
Coral Gables, FL 33146
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 4,224
Downloads: 1,259
Download Rank: 11,365
Footnotes:  45