What Do Federal District Judges Want? An Analysis of Publications, Citations, and Reversals
38 Pages Posted: 16 Jan 2010 Last revised: 29 Jan 2010
Date Written: January 5, 2010
Abstract
We report evidence from a dataset of federal district judges from 2001 to 2002 that district judges adjust their opinion-writing practices to minimize their workload while maximizing their reputation and chance for elevation to a higher court. District judges in circuits with politically uniform circuit judges are better able to predict what opinions will get affirmed by the circuit court, leading to higher publication rates and a higher affirmance rate. In contrast, district judges in circuits with politically diverse circuit judges are less able to predict the preferences of the reviewing circuit court panel, leading district judges to publish fewer but higher quality opinions in an effort to maximize their affirmance rate.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
By Stephen J. Choi, Mitu Gulati, ...
-
By Anthony Niblett, Richard A. Posner, ...
-
By Anthony Niblett, Richard A. Posner, ...
-
Rational Judicial Behavior: A Statistical Study
By William M. Landes, Richard A. Posner, ...
-
Choosing the Next Supreme Court Justice: An Empirical Ranking of Judicial Performance
By Stephen J. Choi and Mitu Gulati
-
Bias in Judicial Citations: A New Window into the Behavior of Judges?
By Stephen J. Choi and Mitu Gulati
-
By Stephen J. Choi and Mitu Gulati
-
The Judicial Confirmation Process: The Difficulty in Being Smart
By John R. Lott