Too Much of a Good Thing? ICC Implementation and the Uses of Complementarity

THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT AND COMPLEMENTARITY: FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE, Carsten Stahn & Mohamed El Zeidy, eds., CUP, 2010

25 Pages Posted: 18 Jan 2010

See all articles by Frederic Megret

Frederic Megret

McGill University - Faculty of Law

Date Written: January 15, 2010

Abstract

This submitted draft attempts to criticize some of the excesses of ICC complementarity when it comes to implementation. The argument is that states are being pushed by transnational civil society to harmonize their domestic laws with the Rome Statute in ways that have little to do with the requirements of complementarity and, instead, reflect traditional human rights and rule of law agendas. I identify several ways in which implementation is being used as a sort of "Trojan horse" for these agendas, and then suggest that the reality of complementarity is that the ICC will almost never find a state unwilling or unable simply because of relatively minor qualitative differences in the substantive or procedural law it applies. The only exception is cases where the absence of implementing legislation makes it impossible for a state to exercise jurisdiction over a crime entering the Court's jurisdiction. I conclude with a few thoughts on what complementarity should be: not so much a stick to beat international criminal law laggards, but a device to manage diversity and pluralism in international criminal law.

Keywords: international criminal law, complementarity, implementation

Suggested Citation

Mégret, Frédéric, Too Much of a Good Thing? ICC Implementation and the Uses of Complementarity (January 15, 2010). THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT AND COMPLEMENTARITY: FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE, Carsten Stahn & Mohamed El Zeidy, eds., CUP, 2010, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1537213

Frédéric Mégret (Contact Author)

McGill University - Faculty of Law ( email )

3644 Peel Street
Montreal H3A 1W9, Quebec H3A 1W9
Canada

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
608
Abstract Views
2,050
Rank
81,514
PlumX Metrics