Intended and Unintended Effects of Youth Bicycle Helmet Laws
30 Pages Posted: 18 Jan 2010 Last revised: 15 Apr 2022
Date Written: January 2010
Abstract
Over 20 states have adopted laws requiring youths to wear a helmet when riding a bicycle. We confirm previous research indicating that these laws reduced fatalities and increased helmet use, but we also show that the laws significantly reduced youth bicycling. We find this result in standard two-way fixed effects models of parental reports of youth bicycling, as well as in triple difference models of self-reported bicycling among high school youths that explicitly account for bicycling by youths just above the helmet law age threshold. Our results highlight important intended and unintended consequences of a well-intentioned public policy.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Is Addiction "Rational"? Theory and Evidence
By Jonathan Gruber and Botond Koszegi
-
An Empirical Analysis of Cigarette Addiction
By Gary S. Becker, Michael Grossman, ...
-
The Effects of Government Regulation on Teenage Smoking
By Eugene M. Lewit, Douglas Coate, ...
-
Price, Tobacco Control Policies and Smoking Among Young Adults
By Frank J. Chaloupka and Henry Wechsler
-
Youth Smoking in the U.S.: Evidence and Implications
By Jonathan Gruber and Jonathan Zinman
-
An Empirical Analysis of Alcohol Addiction: Results from the Monitoring the Future Panels
By Michael Grossman, Frank J. Chaloupka, ...