Extreme Measures: Does the United States Need Preventive Detention to Combat Domestic Terrorism?
affiliation not provided to SSRN
January 18, 2010
Touro International Law Review, Vol. 14, p. 128, 2010
The paper deals with preventive detention in the United States, i.e. the detaining of a suspect to prevent a future domestic terrorist offense. Two recent events are examined: the Fort Hood shootings; and a preventive arrest in France, to consider problems in combating terrorist crimes on U.S. soil. The paper demonstrates that U.S. law as it now stands, with some limited exceptions, does not permit detention to forestall an anticipated domestic terrorist crime. After reviewing and evaluating the way in which France, Israel and the United Kingdom use forms of preventive detention to thwart possible terrorist acts, the paper proposes three possible ways to fill this gap in U.S. law, and give the United States the same tools to fight terrorism as the other countries discussed in the paper, within the boundaries of the Constitution.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 52
Keywords: Preventive detention, prevention of future terrorist acts, French, Israeli and British law
Date posted: January 19, 2010 ; Last revised: March 28, 2011