Approaches to Resolving Growing Conflicts between Human Rights and International Law Norms in British and European Courts

46 Pages Posted: 3 Jun 2011

See all articles by Atli Stannard

Atli Stannard

Middle Temple; University of Cambridge; University of Oxford

Date Written: April 27, 2009

Abstract

This paper examines, in detail, the operation of Article 103 of the UN Charter, including in regards to, "ius cogens." It analyses the position of the Security Council in relation to the rule of law, and the role of the International Court of Justice and national courts in enforcing it. It analyses the cases of R. (Al-Jedda) v. Secretary of State for Defence [2008] 1 A.C. 332 in the UK Supreme Court, and Kadi and Al Barakaat International v. Council and Commission (joined cases C- 402/05 P and C-415/05 P) in the European Court of Justice, as concrete examples of the resolution of norm conflicts as between Security Council resolutions and human rights treaties. Both cases are praised for drawing a fine balance between the protection of fundamental human rights and the need to limit threats to international security.

Keywords: Human Rights, Public International Law, Al-Jedda, Kadi

JEL Classification: K33, H56

Suggested Citation

Stannard, Atli T. J., Approaches to Resolving Growing Conflicts between Human Rights and International Law Norms in British and European Courts (April 27, 2009). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1539215 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1539215

Atli T. J. Stannard (Contact Author)

Middle Temple ( email )

London
United Kingdom

University of Cambridge ( email )

10 West Road
Cambridge, CB3 9DZ
United Kingdom

University of Oxford ( email )

Manor Road
Oxford, OX1 3UQ
United Kingdom

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
175
Abstract Views
1,284
Rank
329,204
PlumX Metrics