Footnotes (325)



The Racial Geography of the Federal Death Penalty

G. Ben Cohen

Robert J. Smith

University of North Carolina School of Law

January 21, 2010

Washington Law Review, Vol. 85, p. 425, 2010

Scholars have devoted substantial attention to both the overrepresentation of black defendants on federal death row and the disproportionate number of federal defendants charged capitally for the murder of white victims. This attention has not explained (much less resolved) these disquieting racial disparities. Little research has addressed the unusual geography of the federal death penalty, in which a small number of jurisdictions are responsible for the vast majority of federal death sentences. By addressing the unique geography, we identify a possible explanation for the racial distortions in the federal death penalty: that federal death sentences are sought disproportionately where the expansion of the venire from the county to the district level has a dramatic demographic impact on the racial make-up of the jury. This inquiry demonstrates that the conversation concerning who should make up the jury of twelve neighbors and peers - a discussion begun well before the founding of our Constitution - continues to have relevance today. This Article documents the historical and racial relationships between place and the ability to seat an impartial jury. We then discuss the unique impact demographic shifts in the jury pool have on death penalty decision making. Finally, we propose three possible solutions: (1) a simple, democracyenhancing fix through a return to the historical conception of the county as the place of vicinage in federal capital trials; (2) a Batson-type three-step process for rooting out the influence of race on the decision to prosecute federally; and/or (3) voluntary measures by the Attorney General to mask demographic and location identifiers when deciding whether to provide federal death-authorization. We explain why a return to county-level jury pools in federal capital cases (whether through statutory construction, legislative change, or through the authority of a fair-minded Attorney General) prospectively limits the impact of race on the operation of the federal death penalty, without establishing the intractability of the federal death penalty as a whole. Finally, we observe that any effort to study the federal death penalty cannot merely address those federal cases in which the Attorney General has considered whether to approve an effort to seek the death penalty, but must also include an assessment of the cases prosecuted in state court that could be prosecuted federally and the prosecutorial decision concerning when and whether to prosecute in federal court.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 68

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: January 22, 2010 ; Last revised: March 21, 2011

Suggested Citation

Cohen, G. Ben and Smith, Robert J., The Racial Geography of the Federal Death Penalty (January 21, 2010). Washington Law Review, Vol. 85, p. 425, 2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1539892

Contact Information

Robert J. Smith (Contact Author)
University of North Carolina School of Law ( email )
CB #3265
Chapel Hill, NC NC 27599
United States
No contact information is available for G. Ben Cohen
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,915
Downloads: 300
Download Rank: 78,639
Footnotes:  325