Citations (1)


Footnotes (33)



Bayesian Contractual Interpretation

Yair Listokin

Yale Law School

Journal of Legal Studies, Forthcoming
Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 202
Yale Law & Economics Research Paper No. 401

Courts seeking the most likely intent of contracting parties should interpret contracts according to Bayes’ Rule. The best interpretation of a contract reflects both the prior likelihood (base rate) of a pair of contracting parties having a given intention as well as the probability that the contract would be written as it is given that intention. If the base rate of the intention associated with the simplest reading of the contract is low, then Bayes’ Rule implies that the simplest reading is not necessarily the interpretation of the contract that most likely captures the parties’ intentions. The Bayesian framework explains when default rules should be more or less “sticky” and helps define the appropriate role of boilerplate language in contractual interpretation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 14

Keywords: contract interpretation, default rules, gap filling

JEL Classification: K12

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: January 26, 2010 ; Last revised: February 19, 2010

Suggested Citation

Listokin, Yair, Bayesian Contractual Interpretation. Journal of Legal Studies, Forthcoming; Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 202; Yale Law & Economics Research Paper No. 401. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1540018

Contact Information

Yair Listokin (Contact Author)
Yale Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States
203-436-2567 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,656
Downloads: 480
Download Rank: 45,070
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  33