Confidential Investigations (Article 54 (3)(E) ICC Statute) vs. Disclosure Obligations - The Lubanga Case and National Law

New Criminal Law Review, Vol. 12, No. 4, Fall 2009

26 Pages Posted: 23 Jan 2010

See all articles by Kai Ambos

Kai Ambos

University of Goettingen (Gottingen)

Date Written: January, 22 2010

Abstract

After a short introduction to the procedural history of the Lubanga case (infra I.) the paper analyses, in its first substantive part (II.), the disclosure regime of the ICC with particular regard to the tension between disclosure and confidentiality as displayed in Lubanga. An in-terpretation of Art. 54(3)(e) ICC Statute which pretends to be compatible with the Prosecutor’s disclosure obligations (Art. 67 (2)) is offered. In the second part (III.), the law on disclo-sure/discovery in England & Wales and the U.S.A. is examined with a view to its possible contribution to an improvement of the ICC disclosure regime. This analysis confirms that the law of disclosure is of great complexity, not least because of the underlying tension between defense rights and opposing interests of public or private security. This tension cannot be solved by blanket rules but only on a case-by-case basis that strives for an appropriate balance between the public interest of an efficient prosecution of (international) crimes and the (disclosure) rights of the accused.

Suggested Citation

Ambos, Kai, Confidential Investigations (Article 54 (3)(E) ICC Statute) vs. Disclosure Obligations - The Lubanga Case and National Law (January, 22 2010). New Criminal Law Review, Vol. 12, No. 4, Fall 2009. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1540623

Kai Ambos (Contact Author)

University of Goettingen (Gottingen) ( email )

Platz der Göttinger Sieben 5
Göttingen, 37073
Germany

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
285
rank
102,639
Abstract Views
1,029
PlumX Metrics