Oil and Democracy in Russia

30 Pages Posted: 25 Jan 2010 Last revised: 24 Apr 2022

See all articles by Daniel Treisman

Daniel Treisman

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - Department of Political Science

Date Written: January 2010

Abstract

Russia is often considered a perfect example of the so-called "resource curse"--the argument that natural resource wealth tends to undermine democracy. Given high oil prices, some observers see the country as virtually condemned to authoritarian government for the foreseeable future. Reexamining various data, I show that such fears are exaggerated. Evidence from around the world suggests that for countries like Russia with an established oil industry, even large increases in the scale of mineral incomes have only a minor effect on the political regime. In addition, Russia--a country with an industrialized economy, a highly educated, urbanized population, and an oil sector that remains majority private-owned--is unlikely to be susceptible to most of the hypothesized pernicious effects of resource dependence.

Suggested Citation

Treisman, Daniel, Oil and Democracy in Russia (January 2010). NBER Working Paper No. w15667, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1540952

Daniel Treisman (Contact Author)

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - Department of Political Science ( email )

405 Hilgard Ave.
3265 Bunche Hall
Los Angeles, CA 90095-1472
United States
650-725-8556 (Phone)
650-723-1687 (Fax)