Oil and Democracy in Russia
30 Pages Posted: 25 Jan 2010 Last revised: 24 Apr 2022
Date Written: January 2010
Abstract
Russia is often considered a perfect example of the so-called "resource curse"--the argument that natural resource wealth tends to undermine democracy. Given high oil prices, some observers see the country as virtually condemned to authoritarian government for the foreseeable future. Reexamining various data, I show that such fears are exaggerated. Evidence from around the world suggests that for countries like Russia with an established oil industry, even large increases in the scale of mineral incomes have only a minor effect on the political regime. In addition, Russia--a country with an industrialized economy, a highly educated, urbanized population, and an oil sector that remains majority private-owned--is unlikely to be susceptible to most of the hypothesized pernicious effects of resource dependence.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Determinants of Expropriation in the Oil Sector: A Theory and Evidence from Panel Data
By Sergei Guriev, Anton Kolotilin, ...
-
Determinants of Nationalization in the Oil Sector: A Theory and Evidence from Panel Data
By Sergei Guriev, Anton Kolotilin, ...
-
Rent Taxation for Nonrenewable Resources
By Diderik Lund
-
Barriers to Foreign Direct Investment Under Political Instability
-
Resource Extraction Contracts Under Threat of Expropriation: Theory and Evidence
-
Trajectories of Regime Transformation and Types of Stateness in Post-Communist Countries
By Andrei Melville, Mikhail Mironyuk, ...
-
Review of Regulatory Burden on the Upstream Petroleum (Oil and Gas) Sector