Attorney Fact-Finding, Ethical Decision-Making and the Methodology of Law

Saint Louis University Law Journal, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 1185-1242, 2001

59 Pages Posted: 25 Jan 2010  

Robert Rubinson

University of Baltimore - School of Law

Date Written: 2001

Abstract

This Article explores the significance, challenges, and complexities of attorney fact-finding in ethical decision-making. Almost all discourse about legal ethics, from the pedagogical to the scholarly to the practical, takes facts for granted in order to focus on issues about ethical rules. The factual dimension of ethical decision-making, however, is critical to the decision-making process and can be subjected to rigorous and systematic study. Indeed, it is lawyers in a situation who engage in ethical decision-making, and such a situation entails the assimilation and interpretation of many sources of information. Such a process necessarily includes the motivations and ambivalence of attorneys themselves. The Article concludes by exploring how ethics scholarship and pedagogy should embrace a more reflective, sophisticated vision of ethics by recognizing issues of fact as crucial to ethical decision-making.

Keywords: legal ethics, legal profession, fact-finding, client representation

Suggested Citation

Rubinson, Robert, Attorney Fact-Finding, Ethical Decision-Making and the Methodology of Law (2001). Saint Louis University Law Journal, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 1185-1242, 2001. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1542088

Robert Rubinson (Contact Author)

University of Baltimore - School of Law ( email )

1420 N. Charles Street
Baltimore, MD 21218
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
46
Abstract Views
406