28 Pages Posted: 30 Jan 2010
Constitutional texts are products of conscious deliberation, although Westminster-based Constitutions are not exhaustive. This article examines whether there are implied rights in the Singapore Constitution, given express ministerial statements affirming the constitutional status of an implied right to vote. It evaluates the debates concerning the legal status of voting rights and explores the possible theoretical bases which may ground an interpretive method supporting the ‘declaration’ of implied fundamental rights, the legitimacy and nature of constitutional implications. Attention is paid to Australian experience in the judicial derivation of an implied right to freedom of political communication in considering methods of constitutional implications. It considers whether it is beneficial and desirable to have an express constitutional right to vote, what its content might be and reflects on the Singapore model of representative democracy and citizenship.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
THIO, Li-ann, Westminster Constitutions and Implied Fundamental Rights: Excavating an Implicit Constitutional Right to Vote. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies, pp. 406-433, December 2009. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1543638
This is a Singapore Journal of Legal Studies paper. Singapore Journal of Legal Studies charges $5.00 .
File name: SSRN-id1543638.
If you wish to purchase the right to make copies of this paper for distribution to others, please select the quantity.