Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Freedom of Speech in School and Prison

36 Pages Posted: 29 Jan 2010 Last revised: 11 May 2010

Aaron H. Caplan

Loyola Law School Los Angeles

Date Written: January 28, 2010

Abstract

Students often compare their schools unfavorably to prisons, most often in a tone of rueful irony. By contrast, judicial opinions about freedom of speech within government-run institutions compare schools and prisons without irony or even hesitation. This Article considers whether the analogy between school and prison in free speech cases is evidence that the two institutions share a joint mission. At a macro-level, there is an undeniable structural similarity between the constitutional speech rules for schools and prisons. At a micro-level, however, there are subtle but significant differences between the two. The differences arise primarily from the judiciary’s belief that differences exist between the purposes of schools and prisons - although, somewhat ominously, the differences appear even more subtle when comparing schools to jails. Just as judicial beliefs about social reality affect constitutional outcomes, the constitutional rules in turn affect social reality. Courts should be wary of language that equates schools with penal institutions, lest the analogy become a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Suggested Citation

Caplan, Aaron H., Freedom of Speech in School and Prison (January 28, 2010). Washington Law Review, Vol. 85, p. 71, 2010; Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2010-2. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1543857

Aaron H. Caplan (Contact Author)

Loyola Law School Los Angeles ( email )

919 Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
293
Rank
86,779
Abstract Views
2,702