Joint Effects of Principles-Based Versus Rules-Based Standards and Auditor Type in Constraining Financial Managers’ Aggressive Reporting

Accounting Review, Vol. 85, pp. 1325-1346, 2010

University of Alberta School of Business Research Paper No. 2013-1018

Posted: 3 Feb 2010 Last revised: 12 Jun 2013

See all articles by Karim Jamal

Karim Jamal

University of Alberta - Department of Accounting, Operations & Information Systems

Hun-Tong Tan

Nanyang Business School, Nanyang Technological University

Date Written: February 2, 2010

Abstract

Managers sometimes implement accounting standards (such as the lease standard) opportunistically to move debt off balance-sheet. Regulators and standard setters are considering the adoption of principles-based accounting standards to reduce such opportunism. We report the results of an experiment in which experienced financial managers, with incentives to structure a transaction off balance sheet, take a reporting position on how a lease is to be reported. We manipulate the type of accounting standards (principles-based, rules-based) and the type of auditor (principles-oriented, rules-oriented, or client-oriented). Results show that for a rules-based standard, auditor-type does not influence participants’ propensity to report the transaction off balance-sheet. However, for a principles-based standard, auditor-type matters in that this propensity is lowest when the auditor is principles-oriented as opposed to rules- or client-oriented. Our results suggest that a move towards more principles-based standards is likely to result in improved financial reporting quality only when there is a corresponding shift in auditors’ mindsets towards beings more principles-oriented.

Keywords: principles-based standards, rules-based standards, auditor-type, off balance sheet debt, transaction structuring

JEL Classification: M40, M41

Suggested Citation

Jamal, Karim and Tan, Hun-Tong, Joint Effects of Principles-Based Versus Rules-Based Standards and Auditor Type in Constraining Financial Managers’ Aggressive Reporting (February 2, 2010). Accounting Review, Vol. 85, pp. 1325-1346, 2010 , University of Alberta School of Business Research Paper No. 2013-1018, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1546583

Karim Jamal (Contact Author)

University of Alberta - Department of Accounting, Operations & Information Systems ( email )

Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2R6
Canada
780-492-5829 (Phone)
780-492-3325 (Fax)

Hun-Tong Tan

Nanyang Business School, Nanyang Technological University ( email )

Singapore, 639798
Singapore
+65 6790 4819 (Phone)
+65 6793 7956 (Fax)

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
1,642
PlumX Metrics