Culture Talk or Culture War in Federal Indian Law?

Alexander Tallchief Skibine

University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law

Tulsa Law Review, Forthcoming

In this article, I ask whether in the area of Native American cultural and religious rights federal law is more inclined towards “culture talk” meaning accommodations and compromises, or whether the attitude is more one of “culture war,” meaning geared towards confrontation and intolerance. I answer the question by focusing on how the law has treated Native American rights in four areas: use of peyote and controlled substances, possession of eagle feathers, implementation of the Native American Graves Protection Act, and protection of sacred sites. Not surprisingly, I conclude that there are both culture talks and culture wars going on. On the other hand, perhaps surprisingly, I find that among the three branches of the federal government, the courts have been the least willing to accommodate Native cultural and religious interests.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: Native Americans, Native American culture, Native American Religion, Sacred sites

JEL Classification: Q15, Q24, Q28

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: February 3, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Skibine, Alexander Tallchief, Culture Talk or Culture War in Federal Indian Law?. Tulsa Law Review, Forthcoming. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1546629

Contact Information

Alexander Tallchief Skibine (Contact Author)
University of Utah - S.J. Quinney College of Law ( email )
383 S. University Street
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0730
United States

Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 707
Downloads: 79
Download Rank: 235,422