Do Small States Get More Federal Monies? Myth and Reality about the US Senate Malapportionment
31 Pages Posted: 3 Feb 2010
Date Written: April 2009
Abstract
We analyze the relationship between senate malapportionment and the allocation of the US federal budget to the states during the period 1978-2002. A substantial literature originating from the influential paper by ?) finds that small and overrepresented states get significantly larger shares of federal funds. We show that these studies suffer from fundamental identification problems and grossly overestimate the impact of malapportionment. Most of the estimated impact is not a scale but a change effect. Rather than evidence of "small state advantage", we find that states with fast growing population are penalized in the allocation of the federal budget independently of whether they are large or small.
JEL Classification: D72, H61, H77
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Allocating the Us Federal Budget to the States: The Impact of the President
By Valentino Larcinese, Leonzio Rizzo, ...
-
Allocating the US Federal Budget to the States: The Impact of the President
By Valentino Larcinese, Leonzio Rizzo, ...
-
Secretaries of Pork? A New Theory of Distributive Public Policy