Footnotes (138)



Myths of (Un)Certainty at the Federal Circuit

Ted M. Sichelman

University of San Diego School of Law

October 22, 2010

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (Symposium Volume), Vol. 43, pp. 1161-1194, Spring 2010

This Essay disputes three "myths" regarding certainty and uniformity in patent law. First, it rebuts the claim that the Federal Circuit has mostly eliminated non-uniformity in the application of patent law. Although the Federal Circuit has generally purged the longstanding doctrinal splits among the regional circuit courts, because most patent actions are not appealed, it is the district courts – which exhibit wide variance from one another – that are the effective courts of last resort. As such, non-uniformity – and attendant forum shopping – remain widespread. Second, this Essay casts substantial doubt on the assertion that the Federal Circuit's high claim construction reversal rates are merely the result of litigants selecting the most uncertain cases for appeal. Rather, in comparison to reversal rates for other patent law issues, as well as rates for other types of complex cases in the regional circuits, the best-supported inference is that claim construction at the Federal Circuit is in need of jurisprudential repair. Third, collecting data from several sources, this Essay contends that the Federal Circuit's reversal rates on the whole are not particularly high, and roughly the same as reversal rates in other circuits, especially those for complex civil cases. Thus, claim construction notwithstanding, for most patent law issues, appeals at the Federal Circuit do not appear to be overly unpredictable or panel-dependent.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 34

Keywords: Federal Circuit, patent law, uniformity, uncertainty, reversal rates, forum shopping, predictability

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: February 3, 2010 ; Last revised: March 25, 2013

Suggested Citation

Sichelman, Ted M., Myths of (Un)Certainty at the Federal Circuit (October 22, 2010). Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (Symposium Volume), Vol. 43, pp. 1161-1194, Spring 2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1547392

Contact Information

Ted M. Sichelman (Contact Author)
University of San Diego School of Law ( email )
5998 Alcala Park
San Diego, CA 92110-2492
United States
(619) 260-7512 (Phone)
(619) 260-2748 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://https://www.sandiego.edu/law/faculty/profiles/bio.php?ID=795
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,326
Downloads: 454
Download Rank: 46,397
Footnotes:  138
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper