Talent Matters: Judicial Productivity and Speed in Japan
27 Pages Posted: 6 Feb 2010 Last revised: 1 Apr 2010
Date Written: February 5, 2010
Abstract
To study the determinants of judicial productivity and speed (measured by published opinions), I examine all 348 trial-court civil medical malpractice opinions published in Japan between 1995 and 2004. For comparative purposes, I add 120 randomly selected civil judgments from the same period. The data cover 706 judges (about a third of the Japanese bench). I find: (A) Productivity correlates with apparent intellectual ability and effort. The judges who attended the most selective universities, who passed the bar exam most quickly, and who were chosen by the courts for an elite career track publish the most opinions. (B) Adjudicatory speed correlates with apparent ability and effort too, but institutional experience counts as well. As the courts acquired increasing experience with malpractice cases, the pace of adjudication quickened.
JEL Classification: K40
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
The Case for Managed Judges: Learning from Japan after the Political Upheaval of 1993
-
The Industrial Organization of the Japanese Bar: Levels and Determinants of Attorney Incomes
By Minoru Nakazato, J. Mark Ramseyer, ...
-
By Vicki Schultz and Stephen Petterson
-
Strategic Judicial Decision Making
By Pablo T. Spiller and Rafael Gely
-
Congress and the Political Expansion of the United States District Courts
By John M. De Figueiredo, Gerald S. Gryski, ...
-
The Supreme Court and the Dig: An Empirical and Institutional Analysis
By Michael Solimine and Rafael Gely
-
The Japanese Judiciary: Maintaining Integrity, Autonomy and the Public Trust
-
By Tonja Jacobi
-
Medical Error as Reportable Event, as Tort, as Crime: A Transpacific Comparison
By Robert B Leflar and Futoshi Iwata
-
The Anatomy of a Conservative Court: Judicial Review in Japan
By David S. Law