Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 83, p. 755, February 1999
Posted: 28 Apr 1999
Internet content filters -- promising a technological solution to the uniquely social problem of widespread availability of adults-only content on the Internet -- appear to shift the debate over control of "cyberporn" from the legislative to the technical. Yet a growing number of commentators are expressing serious reservations about the free speech implications of filters. In this Article, I note that the ever-changing relationship between technology, network economics, and legal doctrine in the new economic and ideological marketplace of Cyberspace will fundamentally impact any constitutional analysis. I argue that the existing literature's analytic reliance on expansive concepts of state action is ill-founded: both vulnerable to technological and legislative manipulation and finding little doctrinal support. Instead, I outline an approach based on First Amendment theories of association, arguing that this "associative" approach -- supported by current precedent -- is the most promising among several alternatives for providing an adaptive and powerful constitutional framework for evaluating indirect government regulation of the Internet.
Notes: This is a description of the article and is not the actual abstract.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Wagner, R. Polk, Filters and the First Amendment. Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 83, p. 755, February 1999. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=154908