Download this Paper Open PDF in Browser

Reaching Out to Do Justice: The Rise and Fall of the Special Docket of the U.S. Supreme Court

69 Pages Posted: 8 Feb 2010 Last revised: 17 Jun 2011

Gabriel "Jack" Chin

University of California, Davis - School of Law

Sara Lindenbaum

University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law

Date Written: June 10, 2011

Abstract

In 1964-1967, the Supreme Court put three complicated cases involving individuals in a permanent state of suspension on what would come to be known as the “Special Docket.” Under this largely unknown feature of the Court’s practice, the cases were held without decision until after the parties involved died in the 1990s. Although the impulse to mercy in these cases was understandable (all involved mental illness and two were capital cases), as a small experiment, it must be adjudged a failure, because there is a reasonable possibility that in each case, just outcomes were not achieved. Assuming that the Court thought judicial intervention was necessary to avoid an unjust outcome, using the normal tools of decision might have been better.

Keywords: Supreme Court, Special Docket, Death Penalty, Warren Burger

JEL Classification: K14, K4, K41, K42

Suggested Citation

Chin, Gabriel "Jack" and Lindenbaum, Sara, Reaching Out to Do Justice: The Rise and Fall of the Special Docket of the U.S. Supreme Court (June 10, 2011). Houston Law Review, Vol. 28, p. 197, 2011; Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No 10-04. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1549697

Gabriel Jackson Chin (Contact Author)

University of California, Davis - School of Law ( email )

Martin Luther King, Jr. Hall
400 Mrak Hall Dr.
Davis, CA 95616-5201
United States
520-401-6586 (Phone)
530-754-5311 (Fax)

Sara Lindenbaum

University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 210176
Tucson, AZ 85721-0176
United States

Paper statistics

Downloads
171
Rank
148,138
Abstract Views
2,147