Competition in State Supreme Court Elections, 1946-2009

Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, Forthcoming

Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-08

31 Pages Posted: 10 Feb 2010 Last revised: 26 Sep 2010

Date Written: September 26, 2010

Abstract

There has been much debate over changes in state supreme court elections. However, most of the research that debate refers to considers a relatively short time span. This paper reports an analysis of contestation and competitiveness in state supreme elections for the entire post-World War II period. The paper considers both primary and general elections (other than retention elections). The central finding of the paper is that outside the South there has in fact been surprising little change, either in whether incumbents are challenged for reelection or in the competitiveness of the elections that are contested (looking separately at open seat elections and elections involving incumbents). The analysis suggests that the apparent increase in contestation and competitiveness reflects factors other than changes to the nature of campaigns and expenditures on state supreme court elections; specifically, those changes are largely a product of the end of the one-party South.

Keywords: State Supreme Court Elections

Suggested Citation

Kritzer, Herbert M., Competition in State Supreme Court Elections, 1946-2009 (September 26, 2010). Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, Forthcoming; Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 10-08. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1550822

Herbert M. Kritzer (Contact Author)

University of Minnesota Law School ( email )

229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
122
Abstract Views
802
rank
226,372
PlumX Metrics