Kelsen - Which Kelsen? A Reapplication of the Pure Theory to International Law

Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 22, pp. 225-249, 2009

25 Pages Posted: 13 Feb 2010 Last revised: 14 Mar 2016

See all articles by Jörg Kammerhofer

Jörg Kammerhofer

University of Freiburg - Faculty of Law

Date Written: April 27, 2009

Abstract

Hans Kelsen is known both as a legal theorist and as an international lawyer. This article shows that his theory of international law is an integral part of the Kelsenian Pure Theory of Law. Two areas of international law are analysed: first, Kelsen's coercive order paradigm and its relationship to the bellum iustum doctrine; second, the Kelsenian notion of the unity of all law vis-à-vis theories of the relationship of international and municipal law. In a second step, the results of Kelsenian general legal theory of the late period – as interpreted and developed by the present author – are reapplied to selected doctrines of international law. Thus is the coercive order paradigm resolved, the unity of law dissolved, and the UN Charter reinterpreted to show that the concretization of norms as positive international law cannot be unmade by a scholarship usurping the right to make law.

Keywords: Hans Kelsen, legal theory, monism, sanctions, UN Charter

Suggested Citation

Kammerhofer, Jörg, Kelsen - Which Kelsen? A Reapplication of the Pure Theory to International Law (April 27, 2009). Leiden Journal of International Law, Vol. 22, pp. 225-249, 2009. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1551759

Jörg Kammerhofer (Contact Author)

University of Freiburg - Faculty of Law ( email )

D-79098 Freiburg
Germany

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
144
Abstract Views
821
rank
200,790
PlumX Metrics