Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 58, p. 1203, 2007
39 Pages Posted: 12 Feb 2010
Date Written: 2007
This Article argues that to be effective both domestic and international disability rights must adopt a disability human rights paradigm. Such a framework combines the type of civil and political rights provided by antidiscrimination legislation (also called negative or first-generation rights) with the full spectrum of social, cultural, and economic measures (also called positive or second-generation rights) bestowed by many human rights treaties. By acting holistically, this agenda accounts for factors normally exogenous to civil rights laws and ensures that individuals can flourish and participate in their societies. Accordingly, our intention is to share some thoughts on how to best provide disabled citizens with equal opportunity rather than “merely” equal treatment. Internationally, States and civil society organizations have been developing innovative and effective equality measures. We draw on their experiences in providing examples of how disability legislation ! and policy can be developed to implement a more holistic human rights approach. These lessons are also pertinent for invigorating the ADA.
The Article proceeds as follows: Parts I and II briefly overview the origins, moral salience, and limitations of the social model’s disability civil rights agenda. Next, Part III advocates for a more integrated, human rights-based approach to disabled empowerment based on a disability human rights paradigm as exemplified by the forthcoming UN Disability Rights Convention. Finally, Part IV briefly illustrates how international practices, in line with a disability human rights based framework can facilitate the development of more effective disability legislation and policy.
Keywords: Disability, Civil Rights, Human Rights, United Nations, Employment Law
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Stein, Michael Ashley and Stein, Penelope J. S., Beyond Disability Civil Rights (2007). Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 58, p. 1203, 2007; William & Mary Law School Research Paper No. 09-38. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1552010 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1552010
By John Bound