Planning & Environmental Law, Vol. 61, No. 11, p. 3, November 2009
12 Pages Posted: 18 Feb 2010
Date Written: November 1, 2009
In Part I, I argued that local governments should be partners with federal and state governments in managing climate change. This may sound incongruous to the ears of those listening to the debates over cap-and-trade legislation. In that context, state and local programs that cap, auction, tax, regulate, track, or otherwise attempt to manage greenhouse gas emissions are criticized on a number of grounds. The same can be said when the debate turns to standards for alternative fuels and vehicles. There is force to the argument that a comprehensive, national program is needed to prevent inefficiencies, inequities, and irregularities in a program that affects industries that function at a national and global level. From this, a generalization is framed: The emission of greenhouse gas causes global, not local, impacts, hence these are matters for national, not local or state, regulation.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Nolon, John R., Climate Change and Sustainable Development: The Quest for Green Communities, Part II (November 1, 2009). Planning & Environmental Law, Vol. 61, No. 11, p. 3, November 2009. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1554085