Do Competition and Ownership Matter? Evidence from Local Public Transport in Europe
42 Pages Posted: 24 Feb 2010
Date Written: February 22, 2010
Abstract
This paper investigates how the ownership and the procedure for the selection of firms operating in the local public transport sector affect their productivity. In order to compare different institutional regimes, we carry out a comparative analysis of 72 companies operating in large European cities. This allows us to consider firms selected either through competitive tendering or negotiated procedures. The analysis of the data on 77 European firms over the period 1997-2006 indicates that firms operate under constant returns to scale. Retrieving the residuals we obtain a measure of total factor productivity, which we regress on firm and city characteristics. We find that when firms are totally or partially in public hands their productivity is lower. Moreover, firms selected through competitive tendering display higher total factor productivity.
Keywords: Local Public Transport, Public Ownership, Translog Production Function
JEL Classification: C33, K23, L25, L33, L91
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN
Recommended Papers
-
Opening Up Public Services to Competition by Putting Them Out to Tender: An Evaluation
By P. Bance
-
The Strategic Process and its Impact on the Outcome of a Tender
By Ola Mattisson and Anna Thomasson
-
By Helmut Cox
-
By Helmut Cox
-
By John Hibbs
-
The Efficiency of Public Sector Outsourcing Contracts: A Literature Review
By Paul H. Jensen and Robin E. Stonecash
-
New Organizational Models in European Local Public Transport: From Myth to Reality
By Andrea Zatti
