Pitfalls in VAR Based Return Decompositions: A Clarification
Shorter and revised version published in: Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 36, Nr. 5, 2012, s. 1255–1265.
34 Pages Posted: 23 Feb 2010 Last revised: 28 Feb 2013
Date Written: September 27, 2010
Abstract
We analyze the pitfalls involved in VAR based return decompositions. First, we show that recent criticism of such decompositions is misplaced and builds on invalid VAR models and erroneous interpretations. Second, we explain the requirements needed for VAR decompositions to be valid. A crucial - but often neglected - requirement is that the asset price needs to be included as a state variable in the VAR. Finally, we clarify the intriguing issue of the role of the residual component in return decompositions. In a properly specified VAR, it makes no difference whether return news and cash flow news are both computed directly or one of them is backed out as a residual.
Keywords: Return variance decomposition, news components, VAR model, information set, predictive variables, redundant models
JEL Classification: C32, G12, G17
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Consumption, Aggregate Wealth and Expected Stock Returns
By Martin Lettau and Sydney C. Ludvigson
-
Risks for the Long Run: A Potential Resolution of Asset Pricing Puzzles
By Ravi Bansal and Amir Yaron
-
Dividend Yields and Expected Stock Returns: Alternative Procedures for Interference and Measurement
-
Resurrecting the (C)Capm: A Cross-Sectional Test When Risk Premia are Time-Varying
By Martin Lettau and Sydney C. Ludvigson
-
Stock Return Predictability: Is it There?
By Geert Bekaert and Andrew Ang
-
Stock Return Predictability: Is it There?
By Geert Bekaert and Andrew Ang
-
Resurrecting the (C)Capm: A Cross-Sectional Test When Risk Premia Wre Time-Varying
By Martin Lettau and Sydney C. Ludvigson