One Share-One Vote is Unenforceable and Sub-Optimal

58 Pages Posted: 24 Feb 2010

See all articles by Avner Kalay

Avner Kalay

Tel Aviv University - Faculty of Management; University of Utah - David Eccles School of Business

Shagun Pant

University of Iowa - Department of Finance

Date Written: November 1, 2009

Abstract

In the presence of derivative markets, shareholders can choose their desired mix of cash-flows/votes and vary it through time. We find that the optimal security-voting structure is time varying. Even in the presence of derivatives, most of the time, shareholders optimally choose 1S1V. 1S1V turns out to be the socially as well as privately optimal choice for the majority of the life-cycle of the firm. However, when faced with a control contest shareholders optimally deviate from 1S1V. Shareholders use synthetic stocks to change their per vote exposure to cash flows and force the winning team to pay them its entire surplus. This flexibility to deviate from 1S1V when needed increases the market value of the firm. We show that during the control contest, the difference between the price of the stock and the synthetic stock provides a measure of the private benefits of control.

Suggested Citation

Kalay, Avner and Pant, Shagun, One Share-One Vote is Unenforceable and Sub-Optimal (November 1, 2009). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1558449 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1558449

Avner Kalay

Tel Aviv University - Faculty of Management ( email )

P.O. Box 39010
Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv, 69978
Israel
972 3 6406298 (Phone)
972 3 6406330 (Fax)

University of Utah - David Eccles School of Business ( email )

1645 E Campus Center Dr
Salt Lake City, UT 84112-9303
United States
801-581-5457 (Phone)

Shagun Pant (Contact Author)

University of Iowa - Department of Finance ( email )

Iowa City, IA 52242-1000
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
184
Abstract Views
3,068
Rank
294,827
PlumX Metrics