Too Much Oil
20 Pages Posted: 25 Feb 2010 Last revised: 22 Apr 2010
Date Written: February 25, 2010
Abstract
Fear for oil exhaustion and its consequences on economic growth has been a driver of a rich literature on exhaustible resources from the 1970s onwards. But our view on oil has remarkably changed and we now worry how we should constrain climate change damages associated with oil and other fossil fuel use. In this climate change debate, economists have pointed to a green paradox: when policy makers stimulate the development of non-carbon energy sources to (partly) replace fossil fuels in the future, oil markets may anticipate a future reduction in demand and increase current supply. The availability of ‘green’ technologies may increase damages. The insight comes from the basic exhaustible resource model. We reproduce the green paradox and to facilitate discussion differentiate between a weak and a strong version, related to short-term and long-term effects, respectively. Then we analyze the green paradox in 2 standard modifications of the exhaustible resource model. We find that increasing fossil fuel extraction costs counteracts the strong green paradox, while with imperfect energy substitutes both the weak and strong green paradox may vanish.
Keywords: Green Paradox, Climate Change, Exhaustible Resources, Fossil Fuels
JEL Classification: Q31, Q54
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Carbon Leakage With International Technology Spillovers
By Reyer Gerlagh and Onno Kuik
-
Carbon Leakage Revisited: Unilateral Climate Policy with Directed Technical Change
-
Carbon Leakage, the Green Paradox and Perfect Future Markets
By Thomas Eichner and Rudiger Pethig
-
Pareto Optimality in the Extraction of Fossil Fuels and the Greenhouse Effect: A Note
-
Pareto Optimality in the Extraction of Fossil Fuels and the Greenhouse Effect: A Note
-
Property Rights and Efficiency of Markets for Environmental Services
-
Is There Really a Green Paradox?
By Rick Van Der Ploeg and Cees Withagen