Police-Induced Confessions, Risk Factors and Recommendations: Looking Ahead
4 Pages Posted: 1 Mar 2010 Last revised: 6 Apr 2010
Date Written: January 1, 2010
Reviewing the literature on police-induced confessions, we identified suspect characteristics and interrogation tactics that influence confessions and their effects on juries. We concluded with a call for the mandatory electronic recording of interrogations and a consideration of other possible reforms. The preceding commentaries make important substantive points that can lead us forward - on the effects of videotaping of interrogations on case dispositions; on the study of non-custodial methods, such as the controversial Mr. Big technique; and on an analysis of why confessions, once withdrawn, elicit such intractable responses compared to statements given by child and adult victims. Toward these ends, we hope that this issue provides a platform for future research aimed at improving the diagnostic value of confession evidence.
Keywords: Police Interviews, Interrogations, False Confessions
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Police-Induced Confessions: Risk Factors and Recommendations
By Saul M. Kassin, Steven A. Drizin, ...
The Substance of False Confessions
What Do Potential Jurors Know about Police Interrogation Techniques and False Confessions?
By Richard A. Leo and Brittany Liu
Miranda's Revenge: Police Interrogation as a Confidence Game
Deceptive Police Interrogation Practices: How Far is Too Far?
By Laurie Magid
The Ethics of Deceptive Interrogation
By Richard A. Leo and Jerome H. Skolnick
All Benefits, No Costs: The Grand Illusion of Miranda’s Defenders
Miranda’s Social Costs: An Empirical Reassessment
A Lie for a Lie: False Confessions and the Case for Reconsidering the Legality of Deceptive Interrogation Techniques