Rules Transparency and Political Accountability
IGIER Universita Bocconi Working Paper No. 147
37 Pages Posted: 30 Mar 1999
Date Written: December 1998
Abstract
Allocative and redistributive rules in the public sector are often less contingent on available information than normative theory would suggest. This paper offers a political economy explanation. Under different rules, even if the observable outcomes of policies remain the same, the informational content which can be extracted by these observations is different. Simpler rules are more transparent because they allow citizens to gain more information on politicians. Since there are limits to what voters can observe, this may be a relevant insight into the functioning of the political system.
JEL Classification: H10
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Firms, Courts, and Reputation Mechanisms: Towards a Positive Theory of Private Ordering
-
Authority and Commitment: Why Universities, Like Legislatures, are Not Organized as Firms
-
The Questionable Empirical Basis of Article 2's Incorporation Strategy: A Preliminary Study
-
Faculty Turnover at American Colleges and Universities: Analysis of Aaup Data
By Ronald G. Ehrenberg, Hirschel Kasper, ...
-
What is a Professional Service Firm? Towards a Theory and Taxonomy of Knowledge Intensive Firms
-
From St. Ives to Cyberspace: The Modern Distortion of the Medieval 'Law Merchant'
-
A Theory of Organizational Dynamics: Internal Politics and Efficiency
By Hongbin Cai and Hong Feng