Government as God: An Update on Federal Intervention in the Treatment of Critically Ill Newborns

21 Pages Posted: 5 Mar 2010

See all articles by Dionne L. Koller

Dionne L. Koller

University of Baltimore - School of Law

Date Written: Winter 2000

Abstract

Whether a severely impaired or critically ill infant should receive lifesaving, and sometimes extraordinary, medical treatment, or be allowed to die, is hotly debated. The issue initially garnered public attention in 1982, when an infant who was born with Down's Syndrome, “Baby Doe,” was allowed to die from a correctable birth defect. Following this, the federal government took a lead role in determining the fate of critically ill newborns. In the meantime, doctors, philosophers, and others have debated whether federal interference in this area is appropriate.

This essay will bring the reader up to date on the “Baby Doe” issue by summarizing the contours of the debate and explaining the legislation, in the form of amendments to the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment and Adoption Reform Act of 1978 (CAPTA), that ultimately resulted from the initial “Baby Doe” controversy. This essay also will add an additional voice to the discussion by criticizing federal intervention in this area on three main grounds. The first ground is that the federal government purports to solve a problem that largely does not exist, and in so doing, it oversimplifies the profound moral questions that surround the issue of whether to aggressively treat a severely impaired newborn. Secondly, federal intervention in this area through the CAPTA Amendments is bad policy because it eliminates parents from the treatment decision. Thirdly, the policy fails on a philosophical level because it does not square with our intuitions. Finally, this essay will highlight a view that is largely missing from the debate on this issue - that of the practicing physicians who work with critically ill, severely impaired newborns and their parents every day. The essay will conclude by briefly suggesting an alternative policy approach, which would presume that parents, in consultation with their doctors, are the appropriate decision-makers in these cases unless circumstances warrant otherwise.

Keywords: infants, medical treatment, critical illness, "Baby Doe", Down's Syndrome, correctable birth defect, critically ill newborns, federal government, CAPTA, parents, doctors, physicians, Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment and Adoption Reform Act of 1978

JEL Classification: K19, K29, K32, K49

Suggested Citation

Koller, Dionne L., Government as God: An Update on Federal Intervention in the Treatment of Critically Ill Newborns (Winter 2000). New England Law Review, Vol. 34, No. 2, 2000. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1563440 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1563440

Dionne L. Koller (Contact Author)

University of Baltimore - School of Law ( email )

1420 N. Charles Street
Baltimore, MD 21218
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
37
Abstract Views
411
PlumX Metrics