Assessing the Competitive Effects of a Merger: Empirical Analysis of Price Differences Across Markets and Natural Experiments
6 Pages Posted: 11 Mar 2010
Date Written: 2007
Abstract
The techniques used by the economic expert witnesses in FTC v. Whole Foods Market illustrate the sophistication and complexity of modern empirical merger analysis. In this issue of Antitrust, we explain the intuition behind these techniques and discuss how the results can be used to assess the competitive effects of a merger. Although these techniques are being used with increasing frequency, we note that whether they are likely to be useful and informative depends on the market at issue and the degree to which the empirical approach captures the key events and market dynamics that drive pricing in the real world.
Keywords: Antitrust, Merger Analysis, Natural Experiments
JEL Classification: L4
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Daubert, Science, and Modern Game Theory: Implications for Merger Analysis
-
Unilateral Effects Under the Guidelines: Models, Merits, and Merger Policy
-
Upward Pressure on Price (UPP) Analysis: Issues and Implications For Merger Policy
By Joseph J. Simons and Malcolm B. Coate
-
The Enhanced Upward Pressure on Price Screen: Merging Markets into the UPP Methodology
-
Continuity and Change in the 2010 Merger Guidelines
By Malcolm B. Coate and Joseph J. Simons
-
Why Can’t We All Just Get Along: Structural Modeling and Natural Experiments in Merger Analysis
-
Critical Loss: Modeling and Application Issues
By Malcolm B. Coate and Joseph J. Simons