Revisiting the 'Predominant Aim' Concept for Determining the Correct Legal Basis

European Law Reporter, No. 2, pp. 59-63, 2010

5 Pages Posted: 7 Mar 2010

See all articles by Nikos Lavranos

Nikos Lavranos

European Federation for Investment Law and Arbitration (EFILA)

Date Written: March 6, 2010

Abstract

In a series of recent cases regarding the determination of the correct legal basis for legislative acts, the ECJ has given clear preference to first pillar competences, thus strengthening the role of the EP to the detriment of the national governments. With the judgment in case C-411/06 (Commission v. EP/Council) Grand Chamber judgment of 8 September 2009, the ECJ rejected the Commission's try to gain a similar preference for exclusive Union competences over the Union's competences shared with the Member States.

Keywords: Exclusive Competences, Shared Competences, ECJ, External Trade, Environment, Predominant Aim

Suggested Citation

Lavranos, Nikos, Revisiting the 'Predominant Aim' Concept for Determining the Correct Legal Basis (March 6, 2010). European Law Reporter, No. 2, pp. 59-63, 2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1566099

Nikos Lavranos (Contact Author)

European Federation for Investment Law and Arbitration (EFILA) ( email )

Brussels
Belgium

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
40
Abstract Views
478
PlumX Metrics