Merger Retrospective Studies: A Review
8 Pages Posted: 9 Mar 2010
Date Written: 2008
Abstract
The debate concerning whether the antitrust agencies under the Bush administration were lax with respect to merger review has led to a call to evaluate retrospectively the competitive effects of consummated mergers. Such information would help assess whether enforcement thresholds have been set too high or too low. In this article we review various merger retrospective studies that have appeared since 1990. These studies often employed the "differences-in-differences" econometric approach. While a majority of the studies found that prices increased post-merger, a significant minority found no price increase.
Keywords: Antitrust, Merger Retrospectives
JEL Classification: L4
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?
Recommended Papers
-
Antitrust Evaluation of Horizontal Mergers: An Economic Alternative to Market Definition
By Joseph Farrell and Carl Shapiro
-
The Effect of Mergers on Consumer Prices: Evidence from Five Selected Case Studies
-
Reinvigorating Horizontal Merger Enforcement
By Jonathan B. Baker and Carl Shapiro
-
Reinvigorating Horizontal Merger Enforcement
By Jonathan B. Baker and Carl Shapiro
-
The Need to Measure the Effect of Merger Policy and How to Do It
-
Why We Need to Measure the Effect of Merger Policy and How to Do it
-
Competition Policy with Optimally Differentiated Rules Instead of 'Per Se Rules vs. Rule of Reason'
-
Merger Simulation in Competition Policy: A Survey
By Oliver Budzinski and Isabel Ruhmer
-
Generating Evidence to Guide Merger Enforcement
By Orley Ashenfelter, Daniel S. Hosken, ...
-
U.S. V. Microsoft: Did Consumers Win?
By David S. Evans, Richard Schmalensee, ...