Fear of the Unknown: Judicial Ethics after Caperton

11 Pages Posted: 9 Mar 2010 Last revised: 17 Mar 2010

See all articles by Bruce A. Green

Bruce A. Green

Fordham University School of Law

Date Written: March 9, 2010


In Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co., the Court recently found that an elected appellate judge’s participation in a company’s appeal violated due process in light of the substantial financial contributions made by the company’s chairman toward the judge’s election. The Court explained that “there is a serious risk of actual bias” on the judge’s part when, as here, “a person with a personal stake in a particular case had a significant and disproportionate influence in placing the judge on the case.” The dissenting Justices targeted the vagueness of the Court’s standard, predicting that it would result in a flood of recusal motions which would bring the judicial process into disrepute. This Essay examines the dissent’s prediction and offers a host of reasons why it is unlikely to come true.

Suggested Citation

Green, Bruce A., Fear of the Unknown: Judicial Ethics after Caperton (March 9, 2010). Syracuse Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 229, 2010, Fordham Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1567553, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1567553

Bruce A. Green (Contact Author)

Fordham University School of Law ( email )

140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States
212-636-6851 (Phone)
212-636-6899 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
PlumX Metrics