California Law Review, Vol. 98, p. 1887, 2010
39 Pages Posted: 11 Mar 2010 Last revised: 20 Sep 2014
Date Written: March 11, 2010
This Article examines the complex ways in which William Prosser shaped the development of the American law of tort privacy. Although Prosser certainly gave tort privacy an order and legitimacy that it had previously lacked, he also stunted its development in ways that limited its ability to adapt to the problems of the Information Age. His skepticism about privacy, as well as his view that tort privacy lacked conceptual coherence, led him to categorize the law into a set of four narrow categories and strip it of any guiding concept to shape its future development. Prosser’s legacy for tort privacy law is thus a mixed one: He greatly increased the law’s stature at the cost of giving it no guidance and making it less able to adapt to new circumstances in the future. If tort privacy is to remain vital in a digital age, it must move beyond Prosser’s conception.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Richards, Neil M. and Solove, Daniel J., Prosser's Privacy Law: A Mixed Legacy (March 11, 2010). California Law Review, Vol. 98, p. 1887, 2010; Washington U. School of Law Working Paper No. 10-03-06. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1567693