The Responsibility for Post-Conflict Reforms: A Critical Assessment of Jus Post Bellum as a Legal Concept

31 Pages Posted: 13 Mar 2010 Last revised: 7 May 2010

See all articles by Eric De Brabandere

Eric De Brabandere

Leiden University - Grotius Centre for International Legal Studies

Date Written: October 1, 2009

Abstract

The increasing involvement of international actors in various forms of international missions set up to supervise reconstruction or peace-building processes has raised many questions with respect to both the legal framework applicable to such activity and the authority to engage in such reforms. Recently, new normative propositions on the subject have been labelled jus post bellum. This Article challenges the usefulness and accuracy of jus post bellum as a legal concept. Such theories either amount to an explicit or implicit challenge of the crucial objectivity of the post-conflict phase by linking the rights and obligations of foreign actors to the legality of the use of force, or they simply bring together previously existing obligations.

Keywords: Post-Conflict Reconstruction, Occupation, United Nations, Jus Post Bellum, Use of Force

Suggested Citation

De Brabandere, Eric, The Responsibility for Post-Conflict Reforms: A Critical Assessment of Jus Post Bellum as a Legal Concept (October 1, 2009). Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1569990

Eric De Brabandere (Contact Author)

Leiden University - Grotius Centre for International Legal Studies ( email )

Leiden University Law Faculty
P.O. Box 9520
Leiden, 2300 RA
Netherlands
+31 71 527 7399 (Phone)
+31 71 527 7509 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.leiden.edu/organisation/publiclaw/publicinternationallaw/staff/eric-de-brabandere-.ht

Here is the Coronavirus
related research on SSRN

Paper statistics

Downloads
126
Abstract Views
729
rank
236,324
PlumX Metrics