Banks and Managerial Discipline: Does Regulatory Monitoring Play a Role?

37 Pages Posted: 1 Oct 2010 Last revised: 1 Sep 2011

See all articles by Ajay A. Palvia

Ajay A. Palvia

Government of the United States of America - Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)

Date Written: September 4, 2010

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of performance, board independence, and regulatory evaluations on CEO turnover in a recent sample of banks. Similar to earlier studies, the results suggest weak performance and greater board independence are positively related to CEO turnover. In addition, poor regulatory ratings and recent rating downgrades are found to have a positive impact on turnover, not fully explained by performance or board characteristics. Finally, the relation between CEO turnover and weak regulatory evaluations is only significant for banks with more independent boards. Overall, the results are consistent with the view that regulatory monitoring enhances managerial discipline in banks but that such discipline may be severely limited in banks with less independent boards.

Keywords: executive turnover, regulatory oversight, performance, monitoring mechanisms

JEL Classification: G3, G28, G31

Suggested Citation

Palvia, Ajay A., Banks and Managerial Discipline: Does Regulatory Monitoring Play a Role? (September 4, 2010). The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Volume 51, Issue 1, February 2011, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1571209

Ajay A. Palvia (Contact Author)

Government of the United States of America - Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) ( email )

550 17th Street NW
Washington, DC 20429
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
131
Abstract Views
1,188
Rank
430,966
PlumX Metrics