The Modest Role of the Warrant Clause in National Security Investigations

16 Pages Posted: 19 Mar 2010 Last revised: 13 Mar 2018

See all articles by Orin S. Kerr

Orin S. Kerr

University of Southern California Gould School of Law

Date Written: November 19, 2011

Abstract

Why is the Warrant Clause of the Fourth Amendment so modest in national security investigations? This symposium essay argues that the Warrant Clause has a narrow role because the extension of the Warrant Clause into national security law forces courts to pose a question that judges cannot readily answer. The cases extending the Warrant Clause to the national security setting held that warrants are required only when a warrant requirement would be reasonable, and the warrants that are required are whatever warrants would be reasonable. This double-barreled reasonableness test gave the Supreme Court the flexibility to insert the Warrant Cause almost anywhere, including the setting of national security investigations. But it came at a cost. The test created to give the Court flexibility forces judges to ask a question they are particularly poorly-equipped to answer. Faced with uncertainty, most judges will remain cautious. As a result, the Warrant Clause will apply broadly in theory but work modestly in practice.

Keywords: Fourth Amendment, national security

JEL Classification: K14

Suggested Citation

Kerr, Orin S., The Modest Role of the Warrant Clause in National Security Investigations (November 19, 2011). 88 Texas Law Review 1669 (2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1571941

Orin S. Kerr (Contact Author)

University of Southern California Gould School of Law ( email )

699 Exposition Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90089
United States

HOME PAGE: http://gould.usc.edu/faculty/?id=73523

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
241
rank
123,839
Abstract Views
1,919
PlumX Metrics