Academic Rankings and Research Governance

IEW Working Paper No. 482

29 Pages Posted: 24 Mar 2010

See all articles by Margit Osterloh

Margit Osterloh

University of Basel; Professor (em.) University of Zurich

Bruno S. Frey

CREMA; University of Basel

Date Written: March 11, 2010

Abstract

Academic rankings today are the backbone of research governance, which seem to fit the aims of “new public management” on the one side and the idea of the “republic of science” on the other side. Nevertheless rankings recently came under scrutiny. We discuss advantages and disadvantages of academic rankings, in particular their unintended negative consequences on the research process. To counterbalance these negative consequences we suggest (a) rigorous selection and socialization, and (b) downplaying the impact of rankings in order to reconcile academic self-governance with accountability to the public.

Keywords: Peer reviews, rankings, research governance, psychological economics, new public management, economics of science, control theory

JEL Classification: H52, H83, I23, J44, L38

Suggested Citation

Osterloh, Margit and Frey, Bruno S., Academic Rankings and Research Governance (March 11, 2010). IEW Working Paper No. 482. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1572261 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1572261

Margit Osterloh (Contact Author)

University of Basel ( email )

Petersplatz 1
Basel, CH-4003
Switzerland

Professor (em.) University of Zurich ( email )

Südstrasse 11
Zürich, CH-8008
Switzerland

Bruno S. Frey

CREMA ( email )

Südstrasse 11
Zurich, CH 8008
Switzerland
+41 44 380 00 78 (Phone)

University of Basel ( email )

Peter Merian-Weg 6
Basel, 4002
Switzerland

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
128
rank
218,114
Abstract Views
870
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations while be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information