Behind the Curtain: Assessing the Case for National Curriculum Standards

28 Pages Posted: 25 Mar 2010

See all articles by Neal McCluskey

Neal McCluskey

Center for Educational Freedom

Date Written: February 17, 2010

Abstract

The argument for national curriculum standards sounds simple: set high standards, make all schools meet them, and watch American students achieve at high levels. It is straightforward and compelling, and it is driving a sea change in American education policy.

Unfortunately, setting high standards and getting American students to hit them is extremely difficult. Politically powerful interest groups must be overcome. Crippling conflicts between different religious, ethnic, and ideological factions must be avoided. And a culture that is generally averse to an intense focus on academics must be transformed. These challenges help to explain why the research on national standards is both very limited and inconclusive.

But what if the research were to clearly show that having national standards leads to superior performance on international tests? Still, there would not be compelling evidence that national standards produce optimal outcomes; economic growth, as well as personal fulfillment, could very well require an education focused on much more than just high test scores.

It appears that the route to successful education goes in the opposite direction of national standards; it goes toward universal school choice. Only a free market can produce the mix of high standards, accountability, and flexibility that is essential to achieving optimal educational outcomes.

Suggested Citation

McCluskey, Neal, Behind the Curtain: Assessing the Case for National Curriculum Standards (February 17, 2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1572589 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1572589

Neal McCluskey (Contact Author)

Center for Educational Freedom ( email )

1000 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20001-5403
United States

Do you have a job opening that you would like to promote on SSRN?

Paper statistics

Downloads
173
Abstract Views
777
rank
216,598
PlumX Metrics