A Postmodern's Hart: Taking Rules Sceptically

Modern Law Review, Vol. 58, pp. 788-819, 1995

16 Pages Posted: 25 Mar 2010

See all articles by Allan Hutchinson

Allan Hutchinson

York University - Osgoode Hall Law School

Date Written: 1995

Abstract

Although considered somewhat passe in the recherche circles of jurisprudential scholarship, H.L.A. Hart's view of law as basically a rule-applying activity remains the guiding theme of many legal practitioners and doctrinal scholars. The fact that his writings are no longer thought of as innovative or exceptional is only testament to their pervasive acceptance as part and parcel of what it is to be and think like a lawyer. Of course, this should not be surprising. His work was informed by the Austin - Wittgenstein imperative that good philosophy was simply making sense of people's daily linguistic practices: The Concept of Law was offered as 'an essay in descriptive sociology. As such, his juristic studies recommended themselves to the practical mind of the common lawyer; there was an intuitive and reassuring fit between what lawyers thought they were doing and what they were told that they should be doing. The fact that Hart's uncluttered writings also justified and set to rest any qualms about the legitimacy of lawyers' and judges' roles in a liberal democracy also helped. Showcased by the elegant simplicity of his writing, Hart's elevation of legal common sense to the status of jurisprudential theory is both his greatest strength and his greatest weakness.

Suggested Citation

Hutchinson, Allan, A Postmodern's Hart: Taking Rules Sceptically (1995). Modern Law Review, Vol. 58, pp. 788-819, 1995, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1574314

Allan Hutchinson (Contact Author)

York University - Osgoode Hall Law School ( email )

4700 Keele Street
Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3
Canada
(416) 736-5048 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
153
Abstract Views
740
Rank
347,308
PlumX Metrics