Ordinary Creativity in Patent Law: The Artist within the Scientist

Missouri Law Review, Vol. 75, No. 1, Winter 2010

Pacific McGeorge School of Law Research Paper

77 Pages Posted: 26 Mar 2010 Last revised: 22 Jun 2017

See all articles by Amy L. Landers

Amy L. Landers

Drexel University Thomas R. Kline School of Law

Date Written: March 18, 2010

Abstract

Patent law is intended to promote the creativity of scientists and engi-neers. The system recognizes that the work of the individual is the engine that ultimately increases the state of scientific knowledge. As economist Paul Romer recognized, “Technological advance comes from things that people do.” Furthering creativity represents the constitutional, theoretical and doc-trinal heart of patent law. Yet the field has not meaningfully evaluated the fundamental question of what creativity is. Using theories from psychology, sociology, history and the philosophy of science, this work examines and pro-poses how patent law can formulate a legal conception of creativity.

To undertake this inquiry, this work focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court’s KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc. decision. When considering the appropriate standard for assessing nonobviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103, the KSR Court used the phrase “ordinary creativity” to refer to the capabilities of the person of ordinary skill, a standard roughly analogous to tort law’s reasonable person. KSR’s choice of this phrase is intriguing, par-ticularly because creativity as a human attribute is notoriously difficult to define. In order to provide a theoretical background that leads to an under-standing of KSR’s ordinary creativity standard, this work explores creativity from an interdisciplinary perspective. Further, the work proposes guidelines that may be used to implement KSR’s flexible standard. More broadly, this work proposes that these interdisciplinary sources can be useful to the field’s understanding of the process of invention.

Keywords: Patent, Nonobviousness, Creativity, Intellectual Property, Invention, Conception, Intlellectual Property

Suggested Citation

Landers, Amy L., Ordinary Creativity in Patent Law: The Artist within the Scientist (March 18, 2010). Missouri Law Review, Vol. 75, No. 1, Winter 2010. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1574442

Amy L. Landers (Contact Author)

Drexel University Thomas R. Kline School of Law ( email )

3320 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States

Register to save articles to
your library

Register

Paper statistics

Downloads
168
rank
175,415
Abstract Views
874
PlumX Metrics
!

Under construction: SSRN citations while be offline until July when we will launch a brand new and improved citations service, check here for more details.

For more information