References (22)


Citations (1)


Footnotes (29)



Censorship and Two Types of Self-Censorship

Philip Cook

University of Leicester

Conrad Heilmann

Erasmus University Rotterdam

March 20, 2010

We propose and defend a distinction between two types of self-censorship: public and private. In public self-censorship, individuals restrain their expressive attitudes in response to public censors. In private self-censorship, individuals do so in the absence of public censorship. We argue for this distinction by introducing a general model which allows us to identify, describe, and compare a wide range of censorship regimes. We demonstrate the efficacy of our model by applying it to the case of the publication of cartoons of Mohammed by the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten. Analysis of this case through our model reveals the presence of both public and private self-censorship. We consider private self-censorship in detail and argue that private self-censorship may occur when an agent acts on behalf of a public agent (private self-censorship by proxy), or when individuals constitute their own censorship regime absent a public agent (private self-censorship by self-constraint). Whilst our paper concentrates on clarifying self-censorship, we end the paper by considering its repercussions for normative analysis. We show that principles of free speech can only be invoked in cases of public self-censorship because coercion is absent in private self-censorship.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 25

Keywords: censorship, self-censorship, free speech, Danish Mohammed cartoons

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 27, 2010 ; Last revised: March 27, 2012

Suggested Citation

Cook, Philip and Heilmann, Conrad, Censorship and Two Types of Self-Censorship (March 20, 2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1575662 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1575662

Contact Information

Philip Cook (Contact Author)
University of Leicester ( email )
University Road
Leicester, LE1 7RH
United Kingdom

Conrad Heilmann
Erasmus University Rotterdam ( email )
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,197
Downloads: 246
Download Rank: 97,839
References:  22
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  29